Wednesday, December 31, 2008

Harvard Girl

From today's Boston Globe:

In China, Ivy League dreams weigh heavily on students


"Harvard Girl," written by the parents of one of the first Chinese undergraduates to enter the university on a full scholarship, chronicled Liu Yiting's methodical upbringing that instilled the discipline and diligence necessary for academic success. The tome has a place in many urban households with high school-age children, and new parents receive the book as a present from family and friends.

"Going to Harvard means that the way they raised their child was successful," said Yang Kui, publisher of the bestseller. "People are willing to copy and learn how they did it."


Yiting Liu, the Original "Harvard Girl"


Sunday, December 28, 2008

Green Dhania Blues

This is a food-science piece I wish I had written. Reproduced from NPR, author Josh Kurz.


Day to Day, December 26, 2008 ·

I hate cilantro. As far as I'm concerned, it should be wiped off the face of the planet. And I'm not alone in my extremist views.

"It has that same sort of acrid sweetness of death," according to my friend Jason. "It's got this evilness to it," my friend Wendy concurs.

For people like us, the smell alone is enough to send us running in horror. But why? What fuels the great cilantro divide?

My quest for answers began with the Internet. It was there that I learned (from questionable sources) that our hatred arises from the fact that we are supertasters. Gifted (or burdened) with a "supersensitive palate," we are some of the rare beings who are tuned into the true nature of this nasty green beast.

" 'Supertasters' is actually a term that was originally envisioned to describe people who were particularly sensitive to a very restricted class of bitter compounds," explains Dr. Danielle Reed of the Monell Chemical Senses Center in Philadelphia, before delivering the big blow: "None of which, to the best of my knowledge, are found in cilantro."

The Official Supertaste Test
Even though Reed has done a ton of research on supertasters, I'm still willing to believe that I'm one of them. I decide to take the official test, which involves chewing up a small strip of paper soaked in propylthiouracil, a special taster chemical, for about a minute.

True supertasters don't need that long to identify the nauseating taste, however.

"If you were a supertaster, you would be very angry with me right now," Reed explains as I dutifully chew the paper. "You would be experiencing that as intensely bitter."

I taste nothing, which leads Reed to conclude that I am a "non-taster." Not even normal taster — a non-taster. "A lot of journalists tend to be non-tasters. Wine reporters are especially upset when they find out," she explains.As it turns out, my girlfriend, Danielle, and my friend Wendy are both supertasters. They can't wait to spit out the paper.

The Unofficial Supersmell Test
After all this, I'm willing to admit that being a supertaster has nothing to do with hating cilantro. So what could it be? The answer comes to me as I chew cilantro while holding my nose. Without smelling it, I find, it's more like harmless old parsley, but when I release my nose, it's like a bottle of soap.

According to Dr. Charles Wysocki, another Monell scientist, the problem extends far beyond me and my group of friends.Wysocki took some chopped up cilantro to Twinsburg, Ohio, for the annual twins festival, and had identical and fraternal twins sniff cilantro and rate pleasantness. People tended to fall mainly into two groups — the lovers and the haters — and identical twins almost always rated cilantro the same way as their sibling counterpart.

This seems to suggest, "that there's a strong genetic component," he explains. "People like you may be smelling things that other people aren't."I gather from this that the problem is that I'm a supersmeller of some sort. While cilantro lovers like Wysocki think cilantro smells "fabtastically savory," we haters are smelling something more. I needed a Gas Chromatograph (GC) to confirm my hypothesis.

The GC is a machine that basically separates a sample of stuff into its constituent compounds. It slowly heats up a sample of material over the course of 40 minutes. As the temperature rises, each compound in the mix evaporates at different times. A flow of air passes over the sample and is split into two streams: One goes past a detector; the other one goes past the subject's nose. So if we put cilantro in the GC and I smell something at minute 8 and something else at minute 12, we can pinpoint what the offending odor is.

I put my supersmelling nose to the test and at 20 minutes, I identify the evil smell.
"They're all unsaturated aldahydes," Dr. George Preti explains. There we have it, the compound that ruins every dish and makes me think of soap.Ten minutes later, Wysocki and Preti identify the unmistakable smell of cilantro that they love. I, however, smell nothing.

This, it turns out, is the real problem. My whole life I've been unable to pick up on the scent that is so overwhelmingly good for cilantro lovers that it trumps any possible bad. I come to a disappointing realization: I am not an X-Man with superkeen sensory abilities. I am a sensory dud who's missing the true nature of cilantro.

Friday, December 19, 2008

Time Savers

An example of a very local and very universal piece. Loved this essay by Georgiana Cohen. Didn't realize the Boston Phoenix carried such pieces. Reproduced verbatim for my, and your, savoring pleasure.
Will be looking for more by this author.


Breaking news: scientists have eradicated the social malady known as "watch tan." The cure, of course, was the advent of the cell phone. With more and more people flipping open their Razrs and such to check the time, rather than consulting a quaint mechanized bundle of quartz or springs and gears fastened to their arms by leather straps, it's only a matter of time before the wristwatch becomes a vintage affectation rather than a critical accessory.

Enter Keith Moskow and Robert Linn, principals of the Boston architectural firm Moskow Linn, whose projects include the recently dedicated 9/11 memorial at Logan International Airport. The two have launched the Thousand Watch Project in hope of creating a monument that will prove — wait for it — timeless.

When Moskow graduated from college in 1983, his parents gave him a nice watch, which shortly took a fatal bath in the washing machine. But he held onto it, and to other broken watches, through two and a half decades and half a dozen moves. Looking over the amassed collection, he wondered: why? Then he noticed none of his younger employees even wore a wristwatch. The era of the wristwatch, which began less than a century ago, seemed to be winding its way toward obscurity.

"With cell phones," he says, "it's reverting back to pocket watches, in a funny way."

A few years ago, Moskow — who became a loyal Swatch man after traveling to Switzerland in the mid 1980s — put his old watches in a cigar box and brought them into the office. Linn then brought in a broken watch his late father had given him. The collection began humbly, but when it reached 30, the partners — inspired by the guy who traded up from a red paper clip to a house, and the intrigue of Institute of Contemporary Art director Jill Medvedow — decided to "go viral." This past summer, they built a Thousand Watch Project Web site
and posted ads on Craigslist pages around the world soliciting other people's watches.

"Every three or four days we get a watch in the mail," says Moskow. "It's the highlight of the day."

Each watch is then tagged, inscribed with a short donor-supplied epitaph, photographed, and uploaded to the Web page. "A kind heart," reads one. "Used for timed writing exercises," reads another. Several dozen of the watches in the collection, which now numbers just shy of 400, were donated by "J.R.," a retired jeweler who met Moskow in the parking lot of Somerville's Home Depot to dump off all the watches he'd been unable to repair over the years.

One of the more interesting submissions came from an Australian man who heard about the project on the radio and sent in a watch that had recently stopped running, 30 years after he acquired it while backpacking in Europe. "I couldn't bear the thought of my watch ending up on a rubbish tip somewhere, and I thought your project would bring its usefulness as a timepiece to [a] dignified end," wrote Shane Hughes. "RIP, you'll always remind me of my youth," read his watch's epitaph.

When the collection reaches a thousand, Moskow and Linn plan to exhibit the watches dangling from the linings of 20 trench coats, in the tradition of the archetypal hot-merchandise street vendor, before donating the collection to the Smithsonian. Not that the Smithsonian sees it coming.

"Something tells me it's weird enough that they might like it," says Moskow.

But this is more than just a collection. Moskow hopes to answer the question of why it is difficult for people to throw out their old wristwatches. One theory is that, since the watch rests so close to the skin, "it becomes a part of you." But maybe it's not about the watch. Maybe it's about all the moments of one's life those hands ticked down, and that's why it's hard to let go.

Whatever the case, while the wristwatch may take a licking, thanks to Moskow and Linn, its legacy will keep on ticking.

Thursday, December 18, 2008

Speaking of Serendipity

I always check the last page of the New Yorker to see if my friend has won the Caption Cartoon Contest. She says she won't quit till she does. So, week after week, I check to see if she is among the finalists. This has become a habit for me. For a change, today, I also read The Mail (Letters to the Editor) before diving into the articles. And, I came across this absolute gem.

It was a comment on Anatomy of a Meltdown. Here is the letter:

Cassidy's piece reminded me of the sage Vemana, who wrote in a poem, in Telugu, several hundred years ago, "After lending money to an uncreditworthy man, it is foolish to tag him and expect him to return the lent money. It is like expecting your chicken to respond to your call after it was eaten by a cat."

B.A. Ramam (sp?)
Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh, India

That letter made my day. Now, I also want to read When God is a Customer, which has writings by other Telugu poets.

Ferran Adria

One of the best talks at Harvard, I missed this year:

Ferran Adrià didn’t even need to demonstrate anything to get oohs and ahhs from his audience. During the world-renowned Catalan chef’s speech in a Harvard lecture hall last week, videos of his playful, experimental cooking techniques sufficed.

“Caviar” droplets of puréed melon liquid inside a gelatinous shell provoked a subdued murmur. A shot of the melon caviar suspended in ham consommé drew louder expressions of wonderment. And when Adrià showed the melon caviar served over wide, flat pasta—made from the same ham purée as the consommé—people laughed out loud.

Adrià’s visit was part theater, but he had a serious purpose as well. During his four days on campus—in media interviews, in lectures, in lab visits—he repeated the same message: combining cooking and science is nothing new.

“Cooking has always been science—physics and chemistry,” he told undergraduates in a course on innovation in science and engineering, where he was the guest lecturer. “When you lit a fire to cook a million years ago, you were already using science.”

He seemed to be speaking indirectly to critics who have called his methods unnecessarily outlandish and even dangerous. One of his signature techniques, the use of liquid nitrogen, isn’t so different from boiling water, he claimed. He said he uses the cold liquid in much the same way—for example, coating a soup ladle in coconut milk, then dipping it in liquid nitrogen to freeze the coconut milk into a shell that can be used as a dessert cup.

People find liquid nitrogen frightening not because it is dangerous, but because it is unfamiliar, Adrià asserted. Yes, you’ll lose your hand if you plunge it into a liquid nitrogen bath for two minutes—but the same thing will happen if you plunge it for two minutes into boiling water, and yet we don’t deplore using boiling water to cook. He urged his listeners not to confuse what is complicated with what is merely new.

Friday, December 12, 2008

By JOVE

I was too lazy to go to this talk and I seem to have missed a op. to learn firsthand about this novel kind of publishing in biology.

One Picture is Worth Thousands of Words or No More Suffering

What is Jove? Journal of Visualized Experiments (JoVE) is a peer reviewed, free access, online journal devoted to the publication of biological research in a video format.
Another local effort, Somerville's Journal of Visualized Experiments, is an open-access video journal that seeks to increase transparency in the how-to part of science, since researchers often waste time trying to replicate another team's experiment.

Saturday, December 6, 2008

Always Infinity

The Lunch With ... is one of my favorite weekend features in FT. Here is a sample:



Lunch with the FT: AG Lafley

By Elizabeth Rigby

Published: December 6 2008 00:22 | Last updated: December 6 2008 00:22

On the 11th floor of Procter & Gamble’s Cincinnati office, AG Lafley has just rolled up the sleeves of his open-necked blue shirt and is standing at the windows of his “huddle room”, hoisting up the metal blinds to let the sunshine in before he settles down for lunch.

The food, covered by the kind of metal lids I last remember seeing in my school canteen, is laid out on the table in his modest meeting room. There is no linen, fancy silverware or waiting staff. There is no bottle of wine resting on the table or even water in a jug.

Despite the simple spread, Lafley is rubbing his hands in anticipation. “What have we got?” he ponders cheerfully as he lifts the lid to reveal a small serving of chicken and spinach salad with goat’s cheese crumbled on top and mustard dressing on the side.

Lafley was, of course, asked out for lunch. But as chief executive of the world’s biggest consumer goods company, he doesn’t have time to step down from his glass tower – he doesn’t have an office as such, having gone open-plan some time in the early noughties – and indulge in a leisurely meal at one of Cincinnati’s plentiful steakhouses.

“I would normally have lunch in 10 or 15 minutes,” he says. He pours the water his assistant brought him while I open my can of Diet Coke. “This would be two lunches for me,” he adds waving his fork between his salad plate and a colourful bowl of fruit salad. I look at my food, amazed that two meals for him would make up the starter and dessert of just one of mine. Then Lafley waves away the bread rolls. “I had bread last night,” he explains.


“I actually had a very American meal last night,” he smiles as he talks about a restaurant outing with new partner Diane the evening before. “I had a steak and it was great. I had a nice split of Pouilly-Fuissé and then I shared a split of Cabernet with the steak, a little salad, a little steak, no dessert,” he enthuses in his slightly nasal New England twang as I mournfully spear some spinach. “I felt really good about my dinner because Diane and I went for the run [before] and she always kicks my tail. My partner is a very committed exerciser and she likes running more than I do, so I often run with her.”

Alan George (everyone calls him AG) Lafley is 61 years old. Sitting next to him, I decide he looks at least 10 years younger than he is. He still manages a five-mile run in about 45 minutes. He exercises five or six times a week and remains very trim, a habit he has stuck to devotedly in an effort to fight the corporate fat that can creep up in his type of job. As the chief executive of the maker of Pampers, Pantene and Ariel he spends “two-thirds” of his life on the road or in the sky.

He and Diane live in a penthouse downtown. He divorced his wife Margaret last year and he doesn’t really want to go into it. “I was married for 35 years. And today I am very hopeful that I am going to get a call very shortly and I will have a second grandchild. It is very exciting.” (His grandchild was born later that day – a boy).

While his long marriage ran its course, his 32-year love affair with P&G lives on. In his eight years at the helm, he has turned it from a bloated and bureaucratic business back into an American icon.

He tells the story of how he did this in his new book The Game-Changer, which he wrote with consultant Ram Charan. Cut through the management-speak and the key to success is simple: observe people going about their daily lives, identify their unmet needs and come up with new products.

They are the sorts of things you wouldn’t necessarily think you wanted – sanitary pads with wings, washing powder for cold water, toothpaste that whitens your teeth – but these inventions have turned P&G from a $40bn company in 2000 to one that sells over $80bn of products. Some 3.5bn people, more than half the world’s population, use a P&G product every day.

I am quite enjoying chatting to him about his eating habits but think I should turn to his book. So, as Lafley absently lifts the red onion out of his salad and drops it into the upturned metal cover, I tell him how some of the stories in the book remind me of the texts I read when I briefly studied social anthropology.

I pick on the instance when P&G tried to kick-start its stagnant laundry market in Mexico by studying low-income women’s daily washing rituals. “That is a great metaphor!” he exclaims when I describe him as a commercial anthropologist. “I have probably seen every kind of consumer research known to man or woman over 32 years. I have sat with my legs in the water of a rural village in China talking with an interpreter to an older woman and her daughter doing her laundry in the river.

“I have probably done laundry in 25 countries. I was in [P&G’s] laundry business for 16 years ... It is like being a social anthropologist ... We should use that one Paul [he turns to his adviser who is sitting in on the lunch], I’m serious.”

“Social or commercial?” I counter. “You’re right, we are not doing it for an academic reason, there is in the end a commercial reason, but we deeply believe that if we don’t do anything to really improve life then we don’t deserve to reap the commercial rewards.”

P&G’s unbroken sales and profit growth under Lafley has brought great rewards to his investors and to him. He was paid $23.5m last year, with $6.6m in cash, and he holds a huge amount in P&G stock. Yet there are no discernible trappings of wealth on his person or hint of hubris in his demeanour. He wears sensible Ecco shoes, rimless spectacles and a simple watch, the face sitting on his inner wrist. There are no flashy cufflinks or expensive shirts with his initials embroidered on the breast. He deals with compliments without being self-deprecating or conceited.

“That is who I am,” Lafley responds when I say he is incredibly understated given his position as one of America’s most celebrated businessmen. “I am a product of my family and education.”

His father started out as a union negotiator, ending his career as a high-flyer working for David Rockefeller as head of human resources at Chase Manhattan Bank. In the intervening years he worked for General Electric, dragging his family around the country as he took on a string of different jobs for the company. Lafley, with his three younger sisters, had to learn to fit into lots of different schools and places.

He once described himself as a “GE brat” but the way he sketches his mother and father suggests he was born into a modest, hardworking family rather than one that popped a silver spoon in his mouth.

“My father was the first person in his family that went to college. They were very small-town people, and they weren’t destitute. My mother’s father was a lineman and a fireman; he strung wire for the telephone company, climbing poles and stringing up wire and drove fire-trucks for volunteer firemen and my father’s father was a foreman in a manufacturing mill, a textile mill, so he was the factory boss.”

As he lays his fork down to take a breather from the salad that he is still only halfway through, he recounts his early years. Having completed high school in Chicago, Lafley went to Paris for a year to study. He started out as a mathematics major and finished up with a full scholarship to do a PhD in medieval and Renaissance history.

A near academic, Lafley’s direction changed with the Vietnam draft. He enlisted with the navy in 1970 and ended up as a supply officer. “My mother was in the navy in the second world war and she said the one thing about the navy is that it is small and collegiate and they have the best food,” he says.

When he returned from war he ditched the PhD and funded himself through Harvard Business School, joining P&G aged 30 in 1977. “[My father] was happy as could be. He couldn’t understand why anybody would want to learn a foreign language.” He then worked his way up through P&G’s laundry business and became head of the global beauty care division and the Asia unit before taking the top slot.

His “dyed-in-the-wool Democrat” mother died four years ago but lived long enough to see him make chief executive. His father, whom he tries to visit every month, still follows the markets and his son’s career closely. “I am going to see him [this weekend] and believe me on Saturday night when we sit down to dinner he will have some advice for me on what we are not doing well,” he is laughing.

While he doesn’t always take his Dad’s advice seriously, he clearly finds comfort in those trips home.

“It is extremely lonely [being a chief executive],” says Lafley as I decide I cannot eat at his pace and polish off the mouthful of salad I have been politely pushing around the plate.

“One of the problems the politicians have is because all their professional colleagues end up being their friends because that is who they see all the time and they are all lobbying for something, because everyone wants something, right? The one thing I can do, and it is a huge advantage of being here, is get on a bicycle and ride up a road and nobody knows who I am,” he says as he picks up his fork and stabs again at his salad.

But surely Lafley is a bit of a celebrity in Cincinnati? This is small-town America with a big-time corporate organisation. His divorce made the local paper.

“There are lots of places where no one knows who I am. You’ll get a kick out of this. I hate to go out New Year’s eve, that is when all the amateurs are drinking, right? So we are sitting around and Diane says, ‘Do you want to go out?’

“So we call up and we get a table for two at the last minute. And we don’t have to dress up, so I am in jeans and a long sleeve T-shirt and a very unstructured blazer-like jacket and we are halfway through the meal and the waiter looks and me and says, ‘Gee, you know you look an awful lot like that Lafley guy over at P&G,’ and Diane says – he puts on a slightly feminine voice – ‘He does but he is a lot different from that guy, and we just laughed and that was just one mile from here.”

But the arrival of Diane on the scene, coupled with his decision to write a book (the how-I-did-it memoir is normally done after retirement) has set tongues wagging that Lafley is getting ready to quit, especially since retirement age for P&G is 65 at most. “I am not going out,” he says. “I love this business, I am not going anywhere, that would be crazy.”

As he gets ready to leave, I ask him whether he is worried that the global financial crisis could end up disrupting his enviable track record, just as he nears his decade at the helm. “We will come out of this, everyone will come out of this. We will grow, just not as fast.”

And then he goes back to the product. “You know we just introduced the most revolutionary product in feminine hygiene in arguably two decades. It is called Always Infinity – I don’t know if it is in the UK yet [it isn’t] – it is far and away the best protection, far and away the best absorbency and it is totally new design, totally new materials and it will sell for a modest premium but, per [sanitary] pad, per period, it is going to be far and away the best deal.”

“Why do we always end talking about tampons and sanitary towels?” I say, thinking about a conversation we had about Tampax last June (he was making a point about women’s shopping habits in a downturn). “I’m sorry about that but at least you finished your lunch,” he says and bursts out laughing.

He, however, still has a good few mouthfuls left despite having been sitting with the salad for one hour and 22 minutes. That is exactly 22 minutes over my time slot and I can see his assistant hovering outside, gesturing at him. “I have to take that phone call, OK,” and he gets up to leave.

But you haven’t even finished the lunch! “I know, I’ll come back and finish it,” he says as he shakes my hand and makes his way back to his desk. I make my way down from the 11th floor and wander out into the Cincinnati sunshine, in search of a cup of coffee and a little more lunch.

Elizabeth Rigby is the FT’s consumer industries editor

...............................................

Procter & Gamble global headquarters
Cincinatti, Ohio

2 x chicken and spinach salad with goat’s cheese, and mustard dressing
2 x fruit salad
1 x water
1 x Diet Coke

Wednesday, December 3, 2008

AIDS Sutra -- Some Interesting Narratives


This was the basis for one very interesting narrative in the book.

From the Lancet:

In the "Dr. Tokugha vs. Apollo Hospital Enterprises" case, the Indian Supreme Court suspended the right to marry of persons who are infected with HIV. Tokugha Yepthomi sued the Apollo Hospital after the hospital revealed his positive HIV status, which was discovered when he donated blood to the hospital; the disclosure caused the cancellation of his upcoming marriage and resulted in his embarrassment and ostracism by the community.

Because the potential bride had been "saved" by the disclosure, Justices Saghir Ahmad and B. N. Kirpal rejected his claim that his right to confidentiality had been violated and ruled against his claim for damages. According to legal activist Shobba Agarwal, the judgment violates a person's right to privacy and confidentiality without establishing any guidelines. Agarwal also said that the judge's statement concerning AIDS as the product of undisciplined sexual impulses shows a lack of AIDS education awareness.

The good doctor Toku was not aware of his condition when he offered to donate blood for the kinsman, who was about to undergo surgery. So the hospital took it upon themselves to inform the relative and, perhaps, every passing stranger in the ward, but not the doctor himself. Toku found out, only much later, thanks to this same kinsman with a perverse sense of drama.

In the judge's mind, is every HIV-positive man a cad who will not disclose his condition to his future wife? Could that be a reason for them to condone the hospital's gross violation of privacy?
I cannot believe I have not heard this story before.